Yazar "Fonseca, Manrique" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Interim rehabilitation of an edentulous situation with an overdenture retained by short implants during a staged vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation: a dental technique
    (Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2023) Fonseca, Manrique; Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Janner, Simone Francesco; Yilmaz, Burak
    Interim rehabilitation of edentulous patients is essential in implant prosthodontics. However, surgical augmentation may be requi red for patients with reduced bone density, which complicates the use of an interim prosthesis. This reportdescribesthe rehabilitation of an edentulous patientwith an interim maxillaryoverdenture re-tained by short implants with individual attachments during the healing period ofvertical and horizontal ridge augmentation. This technique increased the stability of the interim prosthesis even with shortened flanges to eliminate any pressure on the surgical site. This technique could also be used when immediate loading is not possible dueto lack of primary stability of the implants placed for definitive fixed prostheses. (Quintessence Int2023;54:296-300; d o i:10.3290/j. q i. b3857201)
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Management of Compromised Spacing in the Esthetic Zone by Combining an Ultra-Thin Partial Ceramic Veneer and a Ceramic Implant Crown: A Case Report of a Multidisciplinary Approach and Technique Description
    (Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., 2024) Fonseca, Manrique; Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro; Dönmez, Mustafa Borga; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Buser, Daniel; Sculean, Anton; Yılmaz, Burak
    Dental implants are commonly used to replace missing single teeth. However, esthetic rehabilitation of an adjacent tooth may also be required due to diastemas, crowding, or existing large direct restorations to improve the final esthetic outcome. With the advancements in ceramics and bonding techniques, minimally invasive esthetic approaches have become viable for compromised spacing issues. This case report describes a dental technique for the esthetic rehabilitation of compromised anterior spacing with a customized zirconia implant abutment at a maxillary central incisor site and a partial ceramic veneer bonded to the adjacent central incisor. © 2024 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Surface roughness, optical properties, and microhardness of additively and subtractively manufactured CAD-CAM materials after brushing and coffee thermal cycling
    (Wiley, 2023) Cakmak, Gulce; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; de Paula, Marcella Silva; Akay, Canan; Fonseca, Manrique; Kahveci, Cigdem; Abou-Ayash, Samir
    Purpose: To evaluate the surface roughness, optical properties, and microhardness of additively or subtractively manufactured CAD-CAM materials after simulated brushing and coffee thermal cycling.Material and methods: Two additively manufactured resins (Crowntec, CT and VarseoSmile Crown Plus, VS) and 3 subtractively manufactured materials (a reinforced composite (Brilliant Crios, BC), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Enamic, VE), and a feldspathic ceramic (Mark II, VM)) were used to fabricate disk-shaped specimens (& Oslash;10x1-mm) (n = 10). Surface roughness, Vickers microhardness, and color coordinates were measured after polishing, while surface roughness was also measured before polishing. Specimens were then subjected to 25000 cycles of brushing and 10000 cycles of coffee thermal cycling, and measurements were repeated after each time interval. Color difference (Delta E-00) and relative translucency parameter (RTP) were calculated. Robust analysis of variance test was used to evaluate surface roughness, Delta E-00, and RTP data, while generalized linear model analysis was used for microhardness data (alpha = 0.05).Results: Material type and time interval interaction affected tested parameters (p <= 0.002). In addition, material type affected all parameters (p < 0.001) other than surface roughness (p = 0.051), and time interval affected surface roughness and microhardness values (p < 0.001). Tested materials mostly had their highest surface roughness before polishing (p <= 0.026); however, there was no clear trend regarding the roughness of materials within different time intervals along with Delta E00 and RTP values within materials or time intervals. VS and CT had the lowest microhardness regardless of the time interval, while the remaining materials were listed as VM, VE, and BC in decreasing order (p < 0.001). Coffee thermal cycling only reduced the microhardness of VM (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Tested additively manufactured resins can be considered more susceptible to simulated brushing and coffee thermal cycling than the other materials, given the fact that their surface roughness and Delta E00 values were higher than previously reported acceptability thresholds and because they had the lowest microhardness after all procedures were complete.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Surface roughness, optical properties, and microhardness of additively and subtractively manufactured CAD-CAM materials after brushing and coffee thermal cycling
    (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2025) Çakmak, Gülce; Dönmez, Mustafa Borga; de Paula, Marcella Silva; Akay, Canan; Fonseca, Manrique; Kahveci, Çiğdem; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Yılmaz, Burak
    Purpose: To evaluate the surface roughness, optical properties, and microhardness of additively or subtractively manufactured CAD-CAM materials after simulated brushing and coffee thermal cycling. Material and methods: Two additively manufactured resins (Crowntec, CT and VarseoSmile Crown Plus, VS) and 3 subtractively manufactured materials (a reinforced composite (Brilliant Crios, BC), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Enamic, VE), and a feldspathic ceramic (Mark II, VM)) were used to fabricate disk-shaped specimens (Ø10×1-mm) (n = 10). Surface roughness, Vickers microhardness, and color coordinates were measured after polishing, while surface roughness was also measured before polishing. Specimens were then subjected to 25000 cycles of brushing and 10000 cycles of coffee thermal cycling, and measurements were repeated after each time interval. Color difference (ΔE00) and relative translucency parameter (RTP) were calculated. Robust analysis of variance test was used to evaluate surface roughness, ΔE00, and RTP data, while generalized linear model analysis was used for microhardness data (α = 0.05). Results: Material type and time interval interaction affected tested parameters (p ≤ 0.002). In addition, material type affected all parameters (p < 0.001) other than surface roughness (p = 0.051), and time interval affected surface roughness and microhardness values (p < 0.001). Tested materials mostly had their highest surface roughness before polishing (p ≤ 0.026); however, there was no clear trend regarding the roughness of materials within different time intervals along with ΔE00 and RTP values within materials or time intervals. VS and CT had the lowest microhardness regardless of the time interval, while the remaining materials were listed as VM, VE, and BC in decreasing order (p < 0.001). Coffee thermal cycling only reduced the microhardness of VM (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tested additively manufactured resins can be considered more susceptible to simulated brushing and coffee thermal cycling than the other materials, given the fact that their surface roughness and ΔE00 values were higher than previously reported acceptability thresholds and because they had the lowest microhardness after all procedures were complete. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists.